Posts con el tag ‘CONFLICT’

Going Directly to Israelis and Palestinians

A proposal published in the New York Times and endorsed together with Shlomo Ben-Ami (Israel’s foreign minister, 2000-2001), Thomas C. Schelling (awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2005 for his work on conflict and cooperation) and Jerome M. Segal (who directs the Peace Consultancy Project at the University of Maryland’s Department of Philosophy) to make suggestions on how to proceed today to find a solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict :

• The U.N. Security Council (or the General Assembly if the United States does not support this approach) will establish a special committee composed of distinguished international figures acting in their own capacity. Possibly it would be headed by a former American statesman or senator.

• UNSCOP-2’s first task would be to determine if there is any possible peace agreement that would be acceptable to a majority of both the Israeli and Palestinian people.

• The committee would go to the region where, over a period of several months, it would conduct a transparent inquiry into the possibility of genuine peace.

First and foremost, it would listen to the Israelis and the Palestinians. Its hearings would be televised. It would conduct public opinion research and study the record of past Israeli-Palestinian negotiations — in particular, the Clinton Parameters and the progress made at Taba and in the Olmert-Abbas round. UNSCOP-2 would seek new ideas for resolving the most difficult issues, such as refugees.

• Assuming the committee concludes that there is sufficient popular support on both sides for a specific peace agreement, it would then develop a draft treaty which it would forward to the Security Council for further action.

• In a departure from 1947, no effort would be made to impose this treaty. Rather, the Security Council would call on Israel and the Palestinians to use the UNSCOP-2 proposal as the starting point for negotiations in which the two sides would seek to determine if they can agree on any mutually acceptable improvements. The United States could be invited into the process to play the role of honest broker.

To read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/opinion/going-directly-to-israelis-and-palestinians.html?_r=2

Opinión, Política Internacional | , , Permalink

Estrategia errada con Palestina

El mayor desafío que tenemos- más allá de la ocupación- es la marginalización, afirma Salam Fayyad, Primer Ministro de la Autoridad Palestina. Fayyad se lamenta del proceso de olvido en el que ha caído la cuestión Palestina

Resulta difícil encontrar a Palestina en la agenda internacional:

El mundo árabe ocupado con sus propios problemas: primaveras y sus consecuencias…

La agenda Europea suficientemente cargada con la crisis económica.

Similar con la agenda de Estados Unidos o de Israel, que contemplan la región bajo el prisma del programa nuclear de Irán. Durante la visita de Netanyahu a EE.UU., el proceso de paz  pareció inexistente.

Palestina se ha convertido en un problema secundario. ¿Pero por cuánto tiempo?

La violencia ha vuelto a abrirse camino.  Después de muchos meses de tregua, el viernes volvió a verse por los cielos cohetes y en la tierra a muertos y a heridos.

Aparte de una gran injusticia, es un gran error estratégico.

Opinión, Política Internacional | , , , , , , , , Permalink